Skip to main content

Select Bibliography: Select Bibliography

Select Bibliography
Select Bibliography
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Mill on the Floss
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
This text does not have a table of contents.

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

Critical Work of Amitav Ghosh

Ghosh, Amitav. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. University of Chicago Press, 2016.

Critical Works on The Mill on the Floss and the Anthropocene

Armstrong, Nancy. How Novels Think: The Limits of British Individualism from 1719-1900.

Columbia University Press, 2006.

Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-

                Century Fiction. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Benjamin, Walter. “On the Concept of History.” Gesammelten Schriften, translated by Dennis Redmond, 1974.

Duncan, Ian. “George Eliot's Science Fiction.” Human Forms: The Novel in the Age of

                Evolution. Princeton University Press, 2019.

Gallagher, Catherine. “The Rise of Fictionality.” The Novel, edited by Franco Moretti.  

Princeton University Press, 2006, pp. 336-363.

Griffiths, Devin. “Falsifying George Eliot.” The Age of Analogy: Science and Literature Between

                the Darwins. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.

Heringman, Noah. “Deep Time at the Dawn of the Anthropocene.” Representations, vol. 129, no. 1, University of California Press, 2015, pp. 56–85.

Latour, Bruno. “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene.” New Literary History, vol. 45, no. 1,  2014, pp. 1–18.

Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Levine, George L. Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Harvard

                University Press, 1988.

Marshall, Ann H. “Act Natural: Dubious Proposals in The Mill on the Floss, The Pastor's                 

Wife, Vera and Rebecca.” Women: A Cultural Review: Reading Elizabeth Von Arnim

                Today, vol. 28, no. 1-2, 2017, pp. 115-129.

McAuley, Kyle. “George Eliot’s Estuarial Form.” Victorian Literature & Culture, Vol. 48, no. 1,

2020, pp.187-217.

McGowan, John P. “The Turn of George Eliot's Realism.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction, vol. 35,
        no. 2, 1980, pp. 171–192.

Miller, Elizabeth Carolyn. “Fixed Capital and the Flow: Water Power, Steam Power, and The Mill on the Floss.” Ecological Form: System and Aesthetics in the Age of Empire, edited by Nathan Hensley and Philip Steer, Fordham University Press, 2019, pp. 85–100.

Nestor, Pauline. “Ethical Evolution: Endogamy and Exogamy in The Mill on the Floss.” George

                Eliot - George Henry Lewes Studies, no. 52-53, 2007, pp. 93-104.

Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press, 2011.

Prizel, Natalie. “Natalie Prizel, Disability Theory, Queer Time, and ‘We Other Victorians.’” V21, 29 June 2015.

Purdy, Jedediah. “A Wilderness Passage into Ecology.” After Nature: a Politics for the Anthropocene, Harvard University Press, 2018, pp. 188–227.

Sale, Elisabeth Even. Determinism and freedom of choice operating through five experiences in psychological development in the lives of three of George Eliot's heroines. MA Thesis, University of Richmond, 1973.

Taylor, Jesse Oak. “Victorians in the Anthropocene.” The Routledge Companion to Victorian

                Literature, edited by Dennis Denisoff, and Talia Schaffer, Routledge, 2020.

Wiesenfarth, Joseph. “Legend in The Mill on the Floss.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 18, no. 1, University of Texas Press, 1976, pp. 20–41.

Annotate

Further Reading
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org