Skip to main content

2020 Teaching & Learning Symposium: Doing Learning Differenty: International Student Experiences with Active Learning

2020 Teaching & Learning Symposium
Doing Learning Differenty: International Student Experiences with Active Learning
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeTeaching & Learning Symposium
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Contributors
  4. Contents
  5. Keynote
  6. Posters
    1. Git Version Control Tools Enhance Instructor Feedback and Team Interactions
    2. An Ungrading Experiment
    3. Does Watching Lecture Videos Improve Grades? Lessons from ENVIR 100
    4. Doing Learning Differenty: International Student Experiences with Active Learning
    5. Constructively Aligning Instruction of Scientific Content with Written-Communication Skills
    6. Teaching Climate Change Through Fiction, Data and Lived Experiences
    7. Podcasting and Public Scholarship Pedagogy
    8. Empowering Creators: Student agency and digital safety in alternative assignments
    9. A Structured Feedback Form to Improve Interactivity in Lectures
    10. Developing an Academic Ultrasound Curriculum:​ Hybrid Learning by and for Busy Clinicians​

Doing Learning Differenty: International Student Experiences with Active Learning

Ellen Ahlness, Department of Political Science, College of Arts and Sciences, UW Seattle
Pratima Jadhav, Leadership and Policy Studies, College of Education, UW Seattle

Active learning has been advocated as a method of instruction in higher educations since the early 1980s, yet little attention has been paid to the way students respond to and perceive the quality of active learning instruction. Notably, there is little understanding of how international students, who prior educational experiences are with transmission centered instruction, are frequently under prepared for the diversity of active learning instructional strategies used in American higher education. Therefore, we ask how do international students perceive the quality and benefit of active learning instruction in American higher education? Shifting the evaluation paradigm to focus on student centered classroom experiences, we conducted an affective study on student reception and perceived value of active learning Through phenomenological interviews with 20 Indian international students studying in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington, we sought to find how participants experienced the transition to active learning, and whether they found value in the new instructional methods. Findings indicate participants found active learning to be more engaging and beneficial for retention; however, expectations could be confusing and predicting one’s success challenging. We provide considerations working with international students most familiar with transmission based instruction and underserved groups.

Doing Learning Differenty Poster

Annotate

Next Chapter
Constructively Aligning Instruction of Scientific Content with Written-Communication Skills
PreviousNext
Symposiums
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org